Rollbacked transfers

Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111
  • #1 2006-04-27 19:31

    Post all rollbacked transfers here. So everyone can discuss about them. And admins comment about why they rollbacked them. Let's keep the word free (and CSM uncorrupted).

  • #2 2006-04-27 19:37

    Do you have any idea how much extra work that would be?

    Most of the transfers involves warnings and bans also. No need for exposing people like that

  • #3 2006-04-27 19:41

    If people break the rules they should be exposed.

  • #4 2006-04-27 19:45

    Quote:

    If people break the rules they should be exposed.

    No, they should'nt be exposed. Also the reason why the page from v1, where you could see the banned clans, were removed in this version.

    If people want's to know which clans have been banned, they should find out them selves

  • #5 2006-04-27 19:46

    Quote:

    Do you have any idea how much extra work that would be?

    Most of the transfers involves warnings and bans also. No need for exposing people like that

    Yep. And why shouldn't we all players know about them. If somebody wants to cheat I don't think he would squeak in a forums about he's multiaccount transfers... And all who cheat are banned. So they cann't say a word. Right?

    E: removed extra letter

    Last edited by Defreeze at 2006-04-27 19:47
  • #6 2006-04-27 19:48

    It's not allowed to post info like that on the forum or anywhere else on CSM.

  • #7 2006-04-27 19:48

    You say this every time, but never give any reasons.

    I can give reasons why they should be exposed:
    - We pay to use this game, we should know what is happening, what people are being banned for.
    - These people have broken the rules, they have no rights to remain annonymous.

    Now you tell me why they shouldn't be exposed.

  • #8 2006-04-27 19:49

    you know all of the names of people in England that broke the rules of law??

  • #9 2006-04-27 19:50

    what is the interest for the community to expose them here ? I don't get the point ...
    An admin did a mistake, that's all, nothing more to say.

    95 % of the rollbacks involved multi+transfer abuse, it already takes a lot of time of the GA who deal with them, no need to add something ( totally useless ) to do.

    Last edited by Etienne at 2006-04-27 19:50
  • #10 2006-04-27 19:50

    No, what I am arguing for is a page showing why people get banned and their username.

    Last edited by Chops at 2006-04-27 19:52
  • #11 2006-04-27 19:51

    Well, admins maybe shouldn't tell us about that, but they should not CLOSE topics where we want to change opinions about cheaters. That's very annoying.

  • + #12 2006-04-27 19:52 Post deleted!

  • #13 2006-04-27 19:52

    Those threads wont get closed as long as you don't start naming individual users.

  • #14 2006-04-27 19:55

    n1 SinneD
    Chops: i think the admins are right cheaters don`t need to be shown .. what do u win by knowing the names of the ones who cheated? does it help u? u play better if u know the names? u sleep better at nights?
    everybody pays to play not only u...even the one who cheated paid [and maybe they paid more than u...to make 39283928 accounts which in case u didn`t find out are no longer free..!]

    Last edited by aDa at 2006-04-27 19:56
  • #15 2006-04-27 19:58

    I made this topic to get some information from players who have bought/sell a player, and the transfer has been rollbacked for some reason. And to know more about them. Not to blame some inviduals. Keep on topic please.

  • #16 2006-04-27 20:03

    not all cheaters get caught.. i saw users that clearly cheated with transfers ( made an account on an onother ip.. bought 1-2 noskill players from his actual account with 4-5k or more.. and when asked made up some stupid stories that they don't know that person who bought them.. or just say it's not their fault that user is stupid..) and received only a lazy warning ..

  • #17 2006-04-27 20:06

    Why are you making this a big deal?

    They are still discussing what to do, so don't bother to riot yet!
    Wait for the final word.

    Most of your don't know what's going on on the backstage so just wai. If the last word is bad news, then you can make this.

  • #18 2006-04-27 20:37

    1337: I know that but in some cases it is pretty hard to talk without naming, should we have Mr. X and Mr. Y with a shot where everyone can read their nicknames?

  • #19 2006-04-27 21:56

    I had my player Ivar-boi on the tl last season. I was bored, and in my boredness i put my player for sale for 250k. Right after i regret it, but i thought there wasn't any ppl whit that amount of cash. But there were... somebody bid on my player, and happely it was rollback. It was because he was inactive, pjeew.

    Last edited by ALL@N at 2006-04-27 21:56
  • #20 2006-04-27 21:58

    5.1 All sorts of boosts are forbidden

    In despite of motives, all sorts and derivates of so called "boosts" are forbidden. A case of a boost can for example mean that a clan is going to quit, thus finishing off all of its money on as many players as he can.

Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111