Rollbacked transfers

Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111
  • #1 2019-02-16 14:52

    Come on... that bid is totally valid and justified.

    Last edited by Wrath at 2019-02-16 14:52
  • #2 2019-02-16 16:29

    Its already handled.

  • #3 2019-02-16 16:41

    I never expected anything else :thumbs:

  • #4 2019-02-21 20:39

    <3

  • + #5 2019-02-26 12:21 Post deleted by Wrath

  • #6 2019-02-26 12:23

    This is how deals are made

  • #7 2019-02-26 12:25

    Wrath wrote:

    This is how deals are made

    haha n1 !

  • #8 2019-02-26 12:44

    Nothing wrong with that bid

  • #9 2019-02-26 13:08

    RAikkonen wrote:

    Nothing wrong with that bid

    sarcasm?

  • #10 2019-02-26 13:31

    Wrath wrote:

    This is how deals are made

    Cheaters

  • #11 2019-02-26 15:46

    Thanks for the reports.
    Its handled

  • #12 2019-02-27 12:49

    ,,,
    what do u think? normal bid?

    Last edited by wargod at 2019-02-27 12:50
  • #13 2019-02-27 13:06

    There was a similar player with 90 quick instead... That sold for 380k a week or two ago.

    So this is normal I would say.

  • #14 2019-02-27 13:33

    medicinmannen wrote:

    There was a similar player with 90 quick instead... That sold for 380k a week or two ago.

    So this is normal I would say.

    380k ? for real ? O_o

  • #15 2019-02-27 13:54

    wargod wrote:

    ,,,
    what do u think? normal bid?

    Seems overpriced - and both parties involved are Spanish.

    It seems like one is doing the other a favour.

    Whether it is enough for rollback, I reckon admins will have to decide.

  • #16 2019-02-27 14:21

    wargod wrote:

    ,,,
    what do u think? normal bid?

    Hard to decide. Looks suspicious buying the first expensive player from the same country, without any plan regarding the team in general. Looks like a friendly bid to me.

  • #17 2019-02-27 14:27

    MaSTaR wrote:

    medicinmannen wrote:

    There was a similar player with 90 quick instead... That sold for 380k a week or two ago.

    So this is normal I would say.

    380k ? for real ? O_o

    Yes, it was 00/99/90/00/00 13yo.

    So it was a little better limits and 2 years younger, so ~300k difference seems correct to me.

    and sorry, it was 357k

    Last edited by bumbiii at 2019-02-27 14:29
  • #18 2019-02-27 14:30

    He can sell the player for 1 csm in a few weeks and say that it was a mistake, right? If some ppl can dodge punishments with that kind of excuses even if they are in the same comm in the past, i do as well.

    I dont see any problem with the bid, good age and limits are ok, i mean, maxed it will cost more than that, im pretty sure. I asked for an evaluation and most of the ppl agree with around 50k.

    Last edited by RAikkonen at 2019-02-27 14:35
  • #19 2019-02-27 14:44

    So you decided to bid from another account, because people told you he was around 50k worth?

  • #20 2019-02-27 14:50

    Donque wrote:

    So you decided to bid from another account, because people told you he was around 50k worth?

    You should stop accusing me of multi account if you can't prove it.

Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111