Rollbacked transfers

Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111
  • #1 2020-04-10 15:13

    I am getting tired of nonsense accusations. Please stay on topic.

  • #2 2020-04-10 16:49

    You just keep deleting my post. i am replying to your previous comment, isn't that normal?

  • #3 2020-04-10 16:49

    Hu7K wrote:

    Phenom wrote:

    In my fair opinion, if it doesn't feel right just don't do it. It's not forbidden, true but why would users take advantage of something that clearly is against the ethics?

    The same goes for people accusing others of cheating without any evidence.

    is this on topic? specially from an admin?! i am replying to this, why are you deleting?

  • #4 2020-04-10 16:57

    So, as you insist on an answer. The stuff you are posting shows you accusing other people of cheating, nothing else. It does not give any evidence and neither does prove anyone cheating. We indeed checked everything you wrote and did not see anything that was wrong about these transfers. Still, you keep continuing your witch-hunt against several users here and the admin team. Writing in public that we would not do our jobs is ridiculous. You playing the moralizer by saying that you would not do unethical things, but in the same sentence accuse several people who did not do anything wrong of cheating is even more ridiculous.

    Last edited by Hu7K at 2020-04-10 16:58
  • #5 2020-04-10 17:14

    Quote:

    1-2 days deadline are used by managers for profit intends. a 1 day deadline with a not too high startbid can pressure potential buyers to drop a bid. after a bidfight it could even result in a transfer value higher than the previously unsuccessful startbid.

    Are you seriously believing in this yourself? It makes no sense that 1 day deadline should be better in any scenario like you describe, and I've never once seen anybody in CSM who believes 1 day deadline is the best option if you want to increase profit.

  • + #6 2020-04-10 17:43 Post deleted by Hu7K

  • #7 2020-04-10 17:46

    mrcarlsen wrote:

    Are you seriously believing in this yourself? It makes no sense that 1 day deadline should be better in any scenario like you describe, and I've never once seen anybody in CSM who believes 1 day deadline is the best option if you want to increase profit.


    just because it might not work in your eyes, doesn't mean others won't use it and succeed with it.
    1 day deadlines + steady decrease of SBs can work well if the selling intent failed with 2-3 days deadline. a method successful managers like vali used in the past and something I'm using too. ofc one can waste weeks doing small SBs steps + selling with 3 days and pay extra salaries. it's up to each manager to figure out his best personal sale strategy.
    another scenario where 1 day deadline could work is when you bought a player, spot a better option few days later, regret the buy and want to hurry up with 1 day deadline to get back cash just in time to go for the better option. ofc it's a risk to plan that time critical. or you got a tryout you want to sell and need the cash asap to buy a player. then you try your luck with 1 day deadline too.

    Last edited by Raid on at 2020-04-10 17:48
  • #8 2020-04-10 23:52

    LINK second time is doing this on the same player, how is not banned?

    Last edited by cRoM at 2020-04-10 23:52
  • #9 2020-04-11 07:44

    cRoM wrote:

    LINK second time is doing this on the same player, how is not banned?

  • #10 2020-04-11 15:31

    cRoM wrote:

    LINK second time is doing this on the same player, how is not banned?


    He doesn't have enough PP( yet) to be banned

    Last edited by kanar at 2020-04-11 15:31
  • #11 2020-04-12 11:26

    cRoM wrote:

    LINK second time is doing this on the same player, how is not banned?


    No worries. The 1.5kk bid doesn't exist anymore. He might received whatever he qualified for: warning/monetary fine/penalty points

  • #12 2020-04-12 11:36

    still no point to bid on him anymore since he will always overbid, im sure even if someone bid 600k he will overbid aniway.

  • #13 2020-04-12 12:27

    He's been warned. Unfortunately, as long as the bid is not unrealistic, we can't roll it back.

  • #14 2020-04-21 16:45

    So just to point you in case you didn’t notice, I’ve seen some transfers that are showing in the lastest times, not full analysed players going for sums they won’t catch even after having the best of lucks getting analysed having 1k like them on the TL going for 15/20/30/40/50k , maybe those sums doesn’t catch the eye but just to prevent you, and question something , how do you handle that? Its quite difficult I guess, sometimes it’s difficult to draw a difference between gamble with possible profit or just give away money ( 😈 ) .

  • #15 2020-04-21 16:58

    Zack wrote:

    So just to point you in case you didn’t notice, I’ve seen some transfers that are showing in the lastest times, not full analysed players going for sums they won’t catch even after having the best of lucks getting analysed having 1k like them on the TL going for 15/20/30/40/50k , maybe those sums doesn’t catch the eye but just to prevent you, and question something , how do you handle that? Its quite difficult I guess, sometimes it’s difficult to draw a difference between gamble with possible profit or just give away money ( 😈 ) .

    Thanks for your hint. Every transfer we've observed in this matter was judged as a gamble unless we did a rollback. If you see such transfers and think it could be something illegal, then please feel free to report it. We are (not only) looking into each reported transfer in depth. The reason for the huge amount of semi-analyzed players results from the changes in the tax system, so this was expected to some point at least

  • #16 2020-05-17 16:12

    Here......check aim and selling a little cheaper?? Hmm...

  • #17 2020-05-17 16:32

    nothing weird here. community member helping each other *sarcasm*

  • #18 2020-05-17 19:52

    ForgeForever wrote:

    Here......check aim and selling a little cheaper?? Hmm...


    Here real value without community mates help Player

    Last edited by ministasiu at 2020-05-17 19:52
  • #19 2020-05-17 22:05

    Its always good to have a backup when you gamble for limits *sarcasm 2 *

    Ps : bien honest after a hard train he can finally go over that value 😁

    Last edited by Zack at 2020-05-17 22:07
  • #20 2020-05-17 22:55

    Just to make it a bit more transparent.
    We do read many of your complaints in this specific forum but we read all transfer reports.
    So far, none of you complaining about that transfer have actually reported that player but ministasiu
    When noone reports, the possibility that a transfer you guys are complaining about goes through is a lot higher.

    So instead of just making useless sarcastic comments, feel free to report when you think a transfer is worth rolling back.

    Current state: we are discussing about that transfer internally. It has not been decided yet if we approve or decline.

    Last edited by Wrath at 2020-05-17 22:56
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111