Rollbacked transfers

Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111
  • #1 2020-05-18 07:20

    @Wrath you are correct. And to save myself I thought that Forge already reported him. But no worries, for future complaints will do a report before posting.

  • #2 2020-05-18 09:32

    I reported this and I will make the same transfer with my IRL friends if it goes through.

    I'm gonna buy all the players with 3/4 limits revealed and then analyze the last skill. If it fails - just sell him to my friends for the same price. I'M GONNA BE RICH!

    On a serious note. I would never do that - but i could.

  • #3 2020-05-18 09:36

    Aim was shown before deadline (and bids) actually.

    Last edited by Hu7K at 2020-05-18 09:36
  • #4 2020-05-18 09:43

    Okay Hu7K - then I have no position on this matter! TY. I just believed this:

    ForgeForever wrote:

    Here......check aim and selling a little cheaper?? Hmm...

  • #5 2020-05-18 09:46

    Verba wrote:

    Okay Hu7K - then I have no position on this matter! TY. I just believed this:

    ForgeForever wrote:

    Here......check aim and selling a little cheaper?? Hmm...

    Yep, I did so too at first

  • #6 2020-05-18 10:44

    To keep it transparent:

    We approved that transfer !!

    Reasons:
    Top5 limits were shown when jack bought that player a season ago.
    Additionally, we did not find any indices that they try to transfer money.
    Truth to be told, 150k is quite on the upper end for an aim 82 player. Since he is a cl, his offs and handling are top limits and he recieved some serious training, we decided to approve that transfer.

  • #7 2020-05-18 21:00

    Thanks Wrath

  • #8 2020-05-21 22:05

    reported

  • #9 2020-05-21 22:50

    lol people can be so stupid ...

  • #10 2020-05-22 00:41

    xD

  • #11 2020-07-01 09:15

    Am I the only one that sees THIS as an abuse?

  • #12 2020-07-01 11:18

    He is worth it? So I don't see it as abuse.

  • #13 2020-07-01 11:29

    PixeL wrote:

    Am I the only one that sees THIS as an abuse?


    No abuse. Someone just bids the higher end in range of pricing for low det.

  • #14 2020-07-01 13:50

    PixeL wrote:

    Am I the only one that sees THIS as an abuse?


    No mate, i reported that a few hours ago before seeing ur post lol
    That player is not even worth half of that value

    Last edited by retiXiii at 2020-07-01 13:51
  • #15 2020-07-01 13:55

    retiXiii wrote:

    That player is not even worth half of that value


    are you sure?
    past examples of low det players without rollback:
    13yo 13yo 91-93-99-91-100 105k
    14yo 98-97-98-90-96 150 SP 100k
    15yo 96-92-100-90-99 58k playerid: 16609372
    16yo 98-96-97-90-99 264 SP 50k playerid: 18729944
    16yo 95-100-95-90-99 207 SP, whiner icon 50k playerid: 18861570
    16yo 98-95-100-91-98 252 SP, media icon 52,5k playerid: 18581872
    17yo 96-93-95-91-99 242 SP 55k playerid: 18581989
    19yo 90-98-91-91-97 592 SP 66,6k playerid: 18172901
    19yo 98-99-100-90-100 366 SP, pusher icon 37,5k playerid: 17735511
    once with more training involved:
    20yo 100-98-95-91-97 565 SP 145,5k playerid: 18735075
    20yo 96-92-96-91-98 567 SP 90,4k playerid: 18735042
    20yo 97-94-97-90-99 601 SP 97k playerid: 18172924
    20yo 91-96-98-91-100 582 SP 83k playerid: 18172895
    20yo 98-96-99-91-100 593 SP 262,5k playerid: 18455437
    21yo 96-88-92-94-95 671 SP 140k playerid: 18031539
    21yo 95-84-96-91-95 457 SP, ak icon 30k playerid: 16887307
    21yo 99-99-95-90-96 575 SP 94k playerid: 18172980
    21yo 98-96-99-91-100 640 SP, ak icon 443k playerid: 18455437
    22yo 97-94-96-90-95 676 SP 88k playerid: 18172967
    22yo 99-92-95-91-96 677 SP, cl icon 255k playerid: 18876324
    22yo 94-99-97-90-99 542 SP 85k playerid: 18315236
    22yo 96-100-100-90-97 658 SP 116k playerid: 18315218
    22yo 91-96-98-91-100 675 SP 210k playerid: 18172895
    23yo 91-88-96-91-95 752 SP 69k
    23yo 96-92-95-91-99 675 SP, green suitcase icon 84k playerid: 18172951
    24yo 100-91-95-90-99 792 SP, ak icon 143,3k playerid: 18172959
    24yo 100-91-97-90-100 669 SP, ak icon 100k playerid: 18315283
    25yo 98-96-91-90-100 776 SP 65k playerid: 18172903
    25yo 93-90-96-91-95 781 SP 66,1k playerid: 18455843
    25yo 95-98-100-91-100 749 SP 123k playerid: 18876315
    26yo 97-100-98-91-95 765 SP 73,5k playerid: 18172974
    26yo 91-93-95-90-96 79k
    26yo 91-91-95-91-96 624 SP, media icon 50k playerid: 17746857
    26yo 97-95-97-90-97 7xx SP 162k
    26yo 96-92-100-90-99 548 SP, ak icon 100k playerid: 16609372
    27yo 96-98-99-91-96 802 SP 77k playerid: 18876244
    27yo 93-99-98-91-98 7xx SP 128k playerid: 15894488
    28yo 99-96-99-90-96 788 SP 92k playerid: 17746575
    28yo 96-92-100-90-97 7xx SP, ak icon 84k playerid: 15585007
    28yo 90-93-100-91-98 768 SP 46k
    28yo 94-98-99-91-98 7xx SP 187k playerid: 17040590
    28yo 100-99-98-91-98 723 SP, low sal icon 150k playerid: 17746599
    29yo 88-88-96-91-95 7xx SP, 1/0 icon 26k
    29yo 100-99-98-91-95 829 SP 80k playerid: 17889259
    29yo 89-93-99-91-96 592 SP 8,8k playerid: 15873753
    29yo 90-93-100-91-98 767 SP 49k playerid: 17604474
    29yo 93-99-98-91-98 747 SP, ak icon 100k playerid: 15894488
    29yo 91-93-99-91-100 6xx SP, m4 icon 40k
    29yo 100-91-97-90-96 798 SP 94k playerid: 18031471
    31yo 92-82-98-90-99 7xx SP 26k playerid: 15089844
    31yo 93-93-98-90-99 750 SP 35k playerid: 17604486
    31yo 96-93-98-90-98 804 SP, low sal icon 70k
    31yo 99-100-98-90-100 819 SP 92,5k playerid: 18595441
    31yo 90-93-95-93-92 8xx SP, pusher + icecube icon 34k
    31yo 100-98-96-91-98 786 SP 90k playerid: 18455424
    32yo 96-92-98-91-97 7xx SP 40k

    Last edited by Raid on at 2020-07-01 14:38
  • #16 2020-07-01 14:04

    Well i dont live in the past, and nowadays it is not worth at all, that he why the player got sold younger for 10k and not for 100k

  • #17 2020-07-01 14:09

    retiXiii wrote:

    Well i dont live in the past, and nowadays it is not worth at all, that he why the player got sold younger for 10k and not for 100k


    obviously the market doesn't share your opinion. else there would be no bid higher than the old price.
    the market is dynamic. prices can decrease and rise + vary within short time. see there as example:
    Season 113 Day 49 Sold to NattyDreadlocks for 50000 csm (17 years)
    Season 113 Day 47 Sold to pт ✖ The ACEs [SD49] for 10000 csm (17 years)
    same bidder, limits are: 97-98-100-97-91

    we will figure out about the market price thing tomorrow night when there is rollback or no rollback. rollback = no market price then.

    Last edited by Raid on at 2020-07-01 14:12
  • #18 2020-07-01 17:42

    50k for that 15 yo is worth it
    i dont see wheres the abuse in that situation
    with golden heart its a 100-100-100-96-100. idk wheres the bid deal for this player so im agreeing with raid on in this situation

    Last edited by wargod at 2020-07-01 17:44
  • #19 2020-07-01 20:53

    Just because someone isn't willing to bid 50k doesn't mean it's not worthy ... That is valid for so many cases .. others it's too obvious ofc.

  • #20 2020-07-01 20:56

    For other hand my player is better in limits , better trained , better xp ,a bit older, and no one bids 50k , what is annoying xD

Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111