Rollbacked transfers

Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111
  • #1 2020-07-01 22:20

    50k bid on him on top of a 5k bid is not realistic at all in this player
    This makes me remember the 1m+ rollback "unrealistic bid" many years ago
    If no one would bid fight this player to 50k, its unrealistic, simple.

  • #2 2020-07-01 22:26

    I agree that this is overpriced, but I also think we should have more liberty in the transfer market. If this Finnish manager, who is active and seemingly has no connection to the Norwegian manager wants it I see no problem if he secures that player with a high bid. One guy is happy for getting the player he wanted, second guy is happy for making a good sale (20% taxed above 10k), let people enjoy the game.

  • #3 2020-07-01 23:42

    retiXiii wrote:

    50k bid on him on top of a 5k bid is not realistic at all in this player
    [...]
    If no one would bid fight this player to 50k, its unrealistic, simple.


    the bidder did it before with another player + without rollback. avoiding a time consuming bidfight by prebidding high to secure a player is a realistic and legit. I showed you a lot of examples with low det players where prices much higher than your personal limits was considered realistic without any rollback.

    retiXiii wrote:

    This makes me remember the 1m+ rollback "unrealistic bid" many years ago.


    the 1m+ rollback matter is a different case.

    arcane wrote:

    I agree that this is overpriced, but I also think we should have more liberty in the transfer market.


    we already have this kind of liberty. for every bargain there is at least one with okish pricing + a overpriced one - all without rollback. for myself the det 91 would be overpriced but in terms of market price considerations personal limits don't matter. the observed range of approved pricing for this kind of young low dets varied between 1 csm and 150k+ csm in the last 5-10 seasons. you can observe a similar ranging for young high offs with aim 85+ hand 90+:
    14yo 86-91-95-99-100 141 SP 6,7k playerid: 18019563
    14yo 86-99-95-100-98 132 SP 10,5k playerid: 18167094
    16yo 85-92-99-100-99 240 SP 52,5k playerid: 18873189
    16yo 86-94-100-98-99 whiner icon 72k playerid: 16319646
    16yo 86-96-100-97-99 200k playerid: 16318407
    17yo 86-91-95-99-100 304 SP 11k playerid: 18019563
    17yo 86-91-95-99-100 310 SP 5789 csm playerid: 18019563
    17yo 86-91-99-98-96 330 SP 2895 csm playerid: 17457958
    17yo 86-92-96-100-96 303 SP, media icon + lvl 1.75 LS 12,5k playerid: 18019593

    Last edited by Raid on at 2020-07-01 23:57
  • #4 2020-07-02 00:25

    Quote:

    we already have this kind of liberty.

    Unfortunately I was welcomed by an instant rollback over a player that more than 7 different clans were bid fighting on, so can't agree here.

  • #5 2020-07-03 17:25

    18y unanalysed - 11k bid from new user same country

  • #6 2020-07-21 12:35

    rollback or no rollback this time: 24yo 95-88-98-97-98 | 666 SP | lvl 3,5 xp
    500k bid resulted in a rollback.
    now Latest bid: 460 000 csm from Alliance » 🤔 @ 2020-07-20 10:44 = no rollback?

    Last edited by Raid on at 2020-07-21 12:35
  • #7 2020-07-21 12:47

    Raid on wrote:

    rollback or no rollback this time: 24yo 95-88-98-97-98 | 666 SP | lvl 3,5 xp
    500k bid resulted in a rollback.
    now Latest bid: 460 000 csm from Alliance » 🤔 @ 2020-07-20 10:44 = no rollback?

    Narko already said nothing like this has happened. Stop spreading lies!

  • #8 2020-07-21 12:55

    Raid on wrote:

    rollback or no rollback this time: 24yo 95-88-98-97-98 | 666 SP | lvl 3,5 xp
    500k bid resulted in a rollback.
    now Latest bid: 460 000 csm from Alliance » 🤔 @ 2020-07-20 10:44 = no rollback?

    He maybe really want that player, I do not think it is an overbid!

  • #9 2020-07-21 13:03

    HoortooN wrote:

    Raid on wrote:

    rollback or no rollback this time: 24yo 95-88-98-97-98 | 666 SP | lvl 3,5 xp
    500k bid resulted in a rollback.
    now Latest bid: 460 000 csm from Alliance » 🤔 @ 2020-07-20 10:44 = no rollback?

    He maybe really want that player, I do not think it is an overbid!

    Other buyer this time.

  • + #10 2020-07-21 14:32 Post deleted by setitoh

  • + #11 2020-07-21 15:18 Post deleted by setitoh

  • + #12 2020-07-21 15:23 Post deleted by setitoh

  • #13 2020-07-21 17:43

    bumbiii wrote:

    HoortooN wrote:

    Raid on wrote:

    rollback or no rollback this time: 24yo 95-88-98-97-98 | 666 SP | lvl 3,5 xp
    500k bid resulted in a rollback.
    now Latest bid: 460 000 csm from Alliance » 🤔 @ 2020-07-20 10:44 = no rollback?

    He maybe really want that player, I do not think it is an overbid!

    Other buyer this time.

    player is worth 500k ++ easily

  • #14 2020-07-21 18:35

    mick wrote:

    bumbiii wrote:

    HoortooN wrote:

    Raid on wrote:

    rollback or no rollback this time: 24yo 95-88-98-97-98 | 666 SP | lvl 3,5 xp
    500k bid resulted in a rollback.
    now Latest bid: 460 000 csm from Alliance » 🤔 @ 2020-07-20 10:44 = no rollback?

    He maybe really want that player, I do not think it is an overbid!

    Other buyer this time.

    player is worth 500k ++ easily

    +1

  • #15 2020-07-21 23:19

    Im happy i got the player, i just did put my max bid i would want to pay and hope to get him. Rollback or not i dont care because i don't really need this exact player and i can buy one later. I guess i will see what admins décide to do.

  • #16 2020-07-21 23:26

    Now he's a NP, so his price is more high.

  • #17 2020-07-22 11:56

    Seems fishy. Rollback and fine would be appropriate ?

  • #18 2020-07-22 11:57

    J0nas wrote:

    Seems fishy. Rollback and fine would be appropriate ?

  • #19 2020-07-22 13:28

    J0nas wrote:

    Seems fishy. Rollback and fine would be appropriate ?

    Quote:

    Latest bid:
    393 750 csm from [мαFіα] » 360° Gamer @ 2020-07-22 13:09
    375 000 csm from The Walking Dead ⚡️ goes kamikaze @ 2020-07-22 12:32

    Spoiling all the fun. :sadpepe: :crypepe: #freeray

  • #20 2020-07-22 13:34

    raid on so rich

Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111