Rollbacked transfers

Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111
  • #1 2020-07-22 13:45

    J0nas wrote:

    Seems fishy. Rollback and fine would be appropriate ?


    csm agent transfers are technically unlimited and can't be rolled back by game admins like user to user transfers. csm agent sales help to remove cash from the game. maybe one of the reasons why there is no rollback for csm agent players.

  • #2 2020-07-22 14:02

    Raid on wrote:

    J0nas wrote:

    Seems fishy. Rollback and fine would be appropriate ?


    csm agent transfers are technically unlimited and can't be rolled back by game admins like user to user transfers. csm agent sales help to remove cash from the game. maybe one of the reasons why there is no rollback for csm agent players.

    It’s a joke 😂

  • #3 2020-07-30 09:00

    Nothing to see here

  • #4 2020-11-12 08:15

    Sure 👍

  • #5 2020-11-12 08:42

    Aries wrote:

    Sure 👍

    i have a question, someone told me people pays / paid "real" money for other "inactive" managers to buy bad players totally overpriced, like this example Aries, is this real?? there are so many bad stories about people cheating in this game, i understand why new managers quit when they here stories like this.

  • #6 2020-11-12 08:48

    I wouldn’t know miss. But I’m sure there has been real money involved in this game to cheat in some way. Who I don’t know and really don’t care. But fairness if TL market is something I care about and deals like this one should imo be rollback

    People who pays money to get a advantage in a browser game is just lazy people. They are not fit to play a manager game 🤷‍♂️

    Last edited by Aries at 2020-11-12 08:48
  • #7 2020-11-12 09:30

    Aries wrote:

    People who pays money to get a advantage in a browser game is just lazy people. They are not fit to play a manager game 🤷‍♂️

    Everyone using coins to lancamp, remember, you are lazy.

    Last edited by rebbyd at 2020-11-12 09:31
  • #8 2020-11-12 09:49

    rebbyd wrote:

    Aries wrote:

    People who pays money to get a advantage in a browser game is just lazy people. They are not fit to play a manager game 🤷‍♂️

    Everyone using coins to lancamp, remember, you are lazy.

    That’s not what I meant 🤣

  • #9 2020-11-12 09:58

    rebbyd wrote:

    Aries wrote:

    People who pays money to get a advantage in a browser game is just lazy people. They are not fit to play a manager game 🤷‍♂️

    Everyone using coins to lancamp, remember, you are lazy.

    We can use coins to lan camp? 😳

  • #10 2020-11-12 09:59

    Someone is ALWAYS trying to find easy ways in gaming. In CSM too. If you cheat, you will be caught eventually though. And don't worry, MissSavage. Most managers play fair because of this. It is not a massive problem fortunately - most of us a just having a good time with this old game and don't care to risk their long beloved account :-)

  • #11 2020-11-12 10:28

    zAiw00t wrote:

    Someone is ALWAYS trying to find easy ways in gaming. In CSM too. If you cheat, you will be caught eventually though. And don't worry, MissSavage. Most managers play fair because of this. It is not a massive problem fortunately - most of us a just having a good time with this old game and don't care to risk their long beloved account :-)

    I understand zAiw00t, my point was more that if you as a new manager hear all the stories and believe them all (some true - some might not be true) i understand why they would leave again right away.

    This community have a lot of good people in it indeed, but also lots of people talking nonsens why i dont know, but take a look around in forum and on discord, and then you know what i am talking about.

    Thank you for the reply <3 i wish you a good day.

    MS

    Last edited by MissSavage at 2020-11-12 10:29
  • #12 2020-11-12 13:30

    Dunno, here is a old(er) topic from TheLegend27 (god bless him) about smth. you mentioned @MissSavage.

    As usual, take it with a grain of salt.

    In the end its a game ander there are always people who try to shortcut things or take advantage of the system - but I doubt that it really has a big impact, so whatever.

  • + #13 2020-11-13 22:53 Post deleted by Hu7K

  • #14 2020-11-16 07:11

    91 awa 100k+

  • #15 2020-11-16 08:53

    PixeL wrote:

    91 awa 100k+

    I don't think the bidders offered 100k for 91 awa. I think they offered 100k for 27yo maxed aim 98, hand 96, qui 99, det 100 and 831sp. With awa 96 the player would probably go +500k because they are so hard to find. Just a different perspective on why 2 managers might disagree with you. :-)

    Last edited by zAiw00t at 2020-11-16 08:53
  • #16 2020-12-23 13:43

    Nothing shady going on here

  • #17 2020-12-23 14:40

    A pusher and a CL - 13yo

    I can see it

  • #18 2020-12-23 23:19

    Icbus wrote:

    A pusher and a CL - 13yo

    I can see it

    yes because a 0 days account know what CL and Pusher icon is worth but not what 81 det and 85 awa do

  • #19 2021-02-03 12:50

    Hello everyone,

    I have a question regarding two transfers that went through today.
    I reported both since the buyer had 0/5 activity and named 'Selling & Quit"
    Not a single pcw booked or played in a very long time either on the buyer.

    I have seen several rollbacks because of these causes, buyer has no activity -> rollback or Player is leaving the game -> rollback

    Don't the same rules apply to all?
    I am not blaming rebbyd for his sales, just think it's unfair if users have different outcome depending on your name and troublemaking skills.

    Last edited by bumbiii at 2021-02-03 12:54
  • #20 2021-02-03 13:03

    bumbiii wrote:

    Hello everyone,

    I have a question regarding two transfers that went through today.
    I reported both since the buyer had 0/5 activity and named 'Selling & Quit"
    Not a single pcw booked or played in a very long time either on the buyer.

    I have seen several rollbacks because of these causes, buyer has no activity -> rollback or Player is leaving the game -> rollback

    Don't the same rules apply to all?
    I am not blaming rebbyd for his sales, just think it's unfair if users have different outcome depending on your name and troublemaking skills.


    Yeah, I also reported those same transfers. Admins can't control paypal activity but they can have common sense to rollback this suspicious transfers based on manager activity and player's market value.

Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111